Advanced Search
umbrella site table of contents purchase content feedback help button home button home button

Hammon J Wi . Extracorporeal Circulation: Organ Damage.
Cohn Lh, ed. Cardiac Surgery in the Adult. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2008:389-414.

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this book
Right arrow Author home page(s):
John W. Hammon
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hammon, J. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hammon, J. W.

CHAPTER 12C

Extracorporeal Circulation

Organ Damage

John W. Hammon

MECHANISMS
STRATEGIES FOR REDUCING MICROEMBOLI
CARDIAC INJURY
NEUROLOGIC INJURY
    Assessment
    Populations at Risk
    Mechanisms of Injury
    Additional Neuroprotective Strategies
    Prognosis
LUNG INJURY
RENAL INJURY
INJURY TO THE LIVER AND GASTROINTESTINAL ORGANS
PANCREATIC INJURY
STOMACH AND GUT INJURY
    Acknowledgements
References
Cardiopulmonary bypass can preempt normal reflex and chemoreceptor control of the circulation, initiate coagulation, activate blood cells, release circulating cell-signaling proteins, generate vasoactive and cytotoxic substances, and produce a variety of microemboli. Venous pressure can be elevated, plasma colloid osmotic pressure is reduced, flow is nonpulsatile, and temperature is manipulated. Tissues and organs may suffer from regional malperfusion that is independent of physiologic controls, and is caused by microemboli, increased interstitial water, and perfusion with a variable amount of cytotoxic substances. Reversible and irreversible cell injury may occur, but damage is diffusely distributed throughout the entire body as individual cells or small groups of cells are affected. Ischemia-reperfusion injury augments damage to the heart and on occasion to other organs. Amazingly, the body is able to withstand and for the most part repair the cellular damage, although some abnormalities may appear later. This section summarizes the reversible and permanent organ damage produced by cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and complements the preceding two sections of this chapter.

MECHANISMS

Cardiac output during CPB is carefully monitored and synchronized with temperature and hemoglobin concentration to ensure that the entire body is adequately supplied with oxygen (see earlier section on extracorporeal perfusion systems). Excessive hemodilution reduces oxygen delivery,685 and hemoglobin concentrations significantly below 8 g/L cause organ dysfunction at temperatures above 30°C.686 However, regional hypoperfusion is not monitored,687 is independent of reflex and chemoreceptor controls, and is influenced by the inflammatory response, which produces circulating vasoactive substances.688689 Regional perfusion is also influenced by acid-base relationships during cooling and may affect postoperative organ function.690691 Alpha-stat management (pH increases during cooling) decreases cerebral perfusion during hypothermia; pH stat (pH 7.40 is maintained by adding CO2) improves organ perfusion but may increase embolic injury.692 Temperature differences within the body and within organs produce regional temperature-perfusion mismatch,693 which can precipitate regional hypoperfusion and acidosis due to inadequate oxygen delivery.

The inflammatory response produces the cytotoxic compounds and activated neutrophils and monocytes that can and do destroy organ and tissue cells (see section 12B). These agents directly access the specialized cells of every organ by passing between endothelial cell junctions to reach the interstitial compartment. Reduced plasma colloid osmotic pressure, elevated venous pressure, and widened endothelial cell junctions694 increase the volume of the interstitial space during CPB in proportion to the duration of bypass, magnitude of the dissection, transfusions, and other factors. In prolonged complicated perfusions the interstitial compartment may increase 18 to 33%,695 but intracellular water does not increase during CPB.

Microemboli are defined as particles less than 500 microns in diameter. They enter the circulation during CPB from a variety of sources.696 Table 12-5 summarizes sources of gas, foreign, and blood-generated microemboli, which are more fully discussed in section 12A. Air entry into the perfusion circuit produces the most dangerous gas emboli because nitrogen is poorly soluble in blood and is not a metabolite. Carbon dioxide is rapidly soluble in blood and is sometimes used to flood the surgical field to displace air.697 Foreign emboli, largely generated in the surgical wound, reach the circulation from the surgical field via the cardiotomy reservoir. The cardiotomy reservoir is the primary source of foreign emboli and the major source of blood-generated emboli, particularly fat emboli.698 Extensive activation and physical damage to blood elements produce a wide variety of emboli, which tend to increase with the duration of perfusion.692,699


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 12–5 Major Sources of Microemboli

 
STRATEGIES FOR REDUCING MICROEMBOLI

Although discussed in earlier sections, the principal methods for reducing circulating microemboli deserve emphasis and include the following: adequate anticoagulation; membrane oxygenator; washing blood aspirated from the surgical wound;700 filtering the cardiotomy reservoir; secure purse-string sutures around cannulas; strict control of all air entry sites within the perfusion circuit; removal of residual air from the heart and great vessels; avoidance of atherosclerotic emboli; and selective filtration of cerebral vessels.701702

Many intraoperative strategies are available to reduce cerebral atherosclerotic embolization. These include routine epicardial echocardiography of the ascending aorta to detect both anterior and posterior atherosclerotic plaques and to find sites free of atherosclerosis for placing the aortic cannula.703 Recently, special catheters with or without baffles or screens have been developed to reduce the number of atherosclerotic emboli that reach the cerebral circulation.701,704 In patients with moderate or severe ascending aortic atherosclerosis a single application of the aortic clamp, as opposed to partial or multiple applications, is strongly recommended and has been shown to reduce postoperative neuronal and neurocognitive deficits in a large clinical series.705 Retrograde cardioplegia is preferred over antegrade cardioplegia in these patients to avoid a sandblasting effect of the cardioplegic solution.706 No aortic clamp may be safe or even possible in some patients with severe atherosclerosis or porcelain aorta. If intracardiac surgery is required in these patients, deep hypothermia may be used with or without graft replacement of the ascending aorta. If only revascularization is needed, pedicled single or sequential arterial grafts,707 T or Y grafts from a pedicled mammary artery,708 or vein grafts anastomosed to arch vessels can be used.

In-depth or screen filters (see section 12A) are essential for cardiotomy reservoirs and are usually used in arterial lines. The efficacy of arterial line filters is controversial since screen filters with a pore size less than 20 microns cannot be used because of flow resistance across the filter. However, air and fat emboli can pass through filters, although 20-micron screen filters more effectively trap microemboli than larger sizes.709

CARDIAC INJURY

It is difficult to separate postoperative cardiac dysfunction from injury due to CPB, ischemia/reperfusion, direct surgical trauma, the disease being treated, and maladjustment of preload and afterload to myocardial contractile function. The heart, like all organs and tissues, is subject to microemboli, protease and chemical cytotoxins, activated neutrophils and monocytes, and regional hypoperfusion during CPB before and after cardioplegia or fibrillatory arrest. However, the heart is protected from CPB for at least one-half of the case when the aorta is cross-clamped. Some degree of myocardial "stunning" during the period coronary blood flow is interrupted is inevitable,710 as is some degree of reperfusion injury after ischemia. Both myocardial edema and distention of the flaccid cardioplegic heart during aortic cross-clamping711 reduce myocardial contractility. Lastly, if myocardial contractility is weak, excessive preload or high afterload during weaning from CPB increases ventricular end-diastolic volume, myocardial wall stress, and oxygen consumption. Thus postoperative performance of the heart depends on many variables and not just the injuries produced by CPB.

NEUROLOGIC INJURY

Because the brain controls all body activity, even small injuries may produce symptomatic, functional losses that are not detectable or important in other organs. Regional hypoperfusion, edema, microemboli, and circulating cytotoxins may cause subtle losses in cognitive function, behavioral patterns, and physiologic and physical function that can pass unnoticed, be accepted and dismissed, or profoundly compromise the patient’s quality of life. Thus the brain is the most sensitive organ exposed to damage by CPB and also the organ that with the heart is most important to protect.

Assessment

Routine assessment of neurologic injury due to CPB is not done for most patients because of the priority of the cardiac lesion and because of costs in time and money. General neurologic examinations by untrained individuals or by members of the surgical team are not adequate to rule out subtle neurologic injuries, and this is the principal reason that the incidence of post-CPB nonstroke neurologic injury varies widely in the surgical literature.712714

For studies designed to assess or reduce neurologic injury caused by CPB, nonroutine preoperative and postoperative tests are required. These special tests include a complete neurologic examination by a trained neurologist. To improve accuracy, a single neurologist should conduct all serial examinations. A standardized protocol of examination should be followed, with uniform reporting of results. The basic, structured examination includes a mental state examination; cranial nerve, motor, sensory, and cerebellar examinations; and examination of gait, station, deep tendon, and primitive reflexes.

The most obvious neuropsychologic abnormalities are coma, delirium, and confusion, but transitory episodes of delirium and confusion are often dismissed as due to anesthesia or medications. More subtle losses are determined by comparison of preoperative and postoperative performances using a standard battery of neuropsychologic tests prepared by a group of neuropsychologists.715 A 20% decline in two or more of these tests suggests a neuropsychologic deficit that should be followed until resolved or not resolved.716

Computed axial tomograms or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans are essential for the definitive diagnosis of stroke, delirium, or coma. Preoperative imaging is usually not necessary when new techniques such as diffusion-weighted MRI imaging, MRI spectroscopy, or MRI angiography are used to assess possible new lesions after operation.717719

Biochemical markers of neurologic injury after cardiac surgery are relatively nonspecific and inconclusive. Neuron-specific enolase (NSE) is an intracellular enzyme found in neurons, normal neuroendocrine cells, platelets, and erythrocytes.720 S-100 is an acidic calcium-binding protein found in the brain.721722 The beta dimer resides in glial and Schwann cells. Both S-100 and NSE increase in spinal fluid with neuronal death721722 and may correlate with neurologic injury after CPB.723 However, plasma levels are contaminated by aspiration of wound blood into the pump and hemolysis, and are often elevated following prolonged CPB in patients without otherwise detectable neurologic injury.724

Populations at Risk

Advancing age increases the risk of stroke or cognitive impairment in the general population, and surgery, regardless of type, increases the risk still higher.725 A European study compared 321 elderly patients without surgery to 1218 patients who had noncardiac surgery and found a 26% incidence of cognitive dysfunction 1 week after operation and a 10% incidence at 3 months.726 Between 1974 and 1990 the number of patients undergoing cardiac surgery over age 60 and over age 70 increased twofold and sevenfold, respectively.727 Figure 12-21 illustrates the relationship between age and cognitive dysfunction after coronary artery bypass graft and demonstrates a steep increase after the age of 60. Genetic factors also influence the incidence of cognitive dysfunction following cardiac surgery.728 The incidence of cognitive dysfunction at 1 week following cardiac surgery is approximately double that of noncardiac surgery.


Figure 21
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 12-21 Effect of age by decade on neuropsychologic outcome after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Abnormal neuropsychologic outcomes at 1 week and 1 month postoperatively are more common with advancing age. Percentages of patients with deficits on two or more tests are shown (n = 374). (Reproduced with permission from Hammon et al.131)

 
As the age of cardiac surgical patients increases, the number with multiple risk factors for neurologic injury also increases. Risk factors for adverse cerebral outcomes are listed in Table 12-6.729 These factors are divided into stroke with a permanent fixed neurologic deficit (type I) and coma or delirium (type II). Hypertension and diabetes occur in approximately 55% and 25% of cardiac surgical patients, respectively.730 Fifteen percent have carotid stenosis of 50% or greater, and up to 13% have had a transient ischemic attack or prior stroke. The total number of atherosclerotic stenoses in the brachiocephalic vessels adds to the risk of stroke or cognitive dysfunction,731 as does the severity of atherosclerosis in the ascending aorta as detected by epiaortic ultrasound scanning.732 Palpable ascending aortic athero- sclerotic plaques markedly increase the risk of right carotid arterial emboli as detected by Doppler ultrasound.733 The incidence of severe aortic atherosclerosis is 1% in cardiac surgical patients less than 50 years old and is 10% in those aged 75 to 80.734


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 12–6 Adjusted Odds Ratios for Type I and Type II Cerebral Outcomes Associated with Selected Risk Factors

 
Mechanisms of Injury

The two major causes of organ dysfunction and injury during CPB are microemboli and hypoperfusion, which are to some extent mutually exclusive. Microemboli are distributed in proportion to blood flow;735 thus reduced cerebral blood flow reduces microembolic injury but increases the risk of hypoperfusion.736 During CPB both alpha-stat acid-base management and phenylephrine reduce cerebral injury in adults, probably by causing cerebral vessel vasoconstriction and reducing the number of microemboli.736737 Air,738 atherosclerotic debris,739 and fat are the major types of microemboli causing brain injury in clinical practice, and all cause neuronal necrosis by blocking small cerebral vessels.692 Massive air embolism causes a large ischemic injury, but gaseous cerebral microemboli may directly damage endothelium in addition to blocking blood flow.740 The recent identification of unique small capillary arteriolar dilatations in the brain associated with fat emboli (Fig. 12-22)741 raises the possibility that these emboli not only block small vessels, but also release cytotoxic free radicals, which may significantly increase the damage to lipid-rich neurons.


Figure 22
View larger version (100K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 12-22 Small capillary and arterial dilatations in cerebral vessels in a patient who expired 48 hours after coronary artery bypass graft surgery using cardiopulmonary bypass. Alkaline phosphatase-stained celloidin section, 100 µm thick 100x.

 
Anemia and elevated cerebral temperature increase cerebral blood flow but may cause inadequate oxygen delivery to the brain;742 however, these conditions are easily avoided during clinical cardiac surgery. Although some investigators speculate that normothermic and/or hyperthermic CPB cause cerebral hypoperfusion,743 experimental studies indicate that cerebral blood flow increases with temperature.744 Brain injuries associated with this practice are more likely due to increased cerebral microemboli, which produce larger lesions at higher cerebral temperatures.735 Reduced brain temperature is protective against neural cell injury and remains an important neuroprotective strategy.

Additional Neuroprotective Strategies

Primary strategies for avoiding air, atherosclerotic particulates, and blood-generated microembolism are presented above and in section 12A. Recommended conditions for protecting the brain during CPB include mild hypothermia (32 to 34°C) and hematocrit above 25%.744 Temporary increases in cerebral venous pressure caused by superior vena cava obstruction and excessive rewarming above blood temperatures of 37°C should be avoided.745746 A randomized study in which patients were mildly rewarmed to 35°C core temperature demonstrated improved neurocognitive outcomes over patients rewarmed to 37°C.746 Either jugular venous bulb oxygen saturation or near-infrared cerebral oximetry are recommended for monitoring cerebral perfusion in patients who may be at high risk for cerebral injury.747

Barbiturates reduce cerebral metabolism by decreasing spontaneous synaptic activity748 and provide a definite neuroprotective effect during clinical cardiac surgery using CPB.749 Unfortunately, these agents delay emergence from anesthesia and prolong intensive care unit stays. A recent study of high-risk patients randomized to aprotinin or placebo found a powerful protective effect against stroke for full-dose aprotinin in coronary artery bypass graft patients.750 A larger randomized multi-institutional study is planned. N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonists, which are effective in animals, provide mild protection compared to control patients, but have a high incidence of neurologic side effects.751 A small study demonstrated a neuroprotective effect of lidocaine.752 Currently no pharmacologic agent is recommended for protection of the central nervous system during CPB.

Off-pump myocardial revascularization theoretically avoids many of the causes of cerebral injury due to CPB, but as noted above, many causes of neuronal injury are independent of CPB and related to atherosclerosis and air entry sites into the circulation. Nonrandomized measurements of carotid emboli by Doppler ultrasound indicate fewer emboli and slightly improved neurocognitive outcomes in high-risk patients who have off-pump surgery.753 A randomized trial of off-pump versus on-pump patients failed to show a significant difference in neurologic outcome between methods.754

Prognosis

Neuropsychologic deficits that are present after 3 months are almost always permanent.755 Assessments after that time are confounded by development of new deficits, particularly in aged patients.756

LUNG INJURY

Patient factors and the separate effects of operation and CPB combine to compromise lung function early after operation. Chronic smoking and emphysema are the most common patient factors, but muscular weakness, chronic bronchitis, occult pneumonia, preoperative pulmonary edema, and unrelated respiratory disease are other contributors to postoperative pulmonary dysfunction. Incisional pain, lack of movement, shallow respiratory sighs, increased work of breathing, reduced pulmonary compliance, weak cough, increased pulmonary arterial-venous shunting, and interstitial edema, to some degree are consequences of anesthesia and any operation. CPB significantly adds to this injury.

During CPB the lungs are supplied by the bronchial arteries and pulmonary arterial blood flow may be absent or minimal. Whether or not alveolar cells suffer ischemic/reperfusion injury is unclear, but the lungs are subject to many insults that combine to increase pulmonary capillary permeability and interstitial lung water. Hemodilution, reduced plasma oncotic pressure, and temporary elevation of left atrial or pulmonary venous pressure during CPB or during weaning from CPB increase extravascular lung water.757,758 Microemboli759 and circulating cellular, vasoactive, and cytotoxic mediators of the inflammatory response760764 reach the lung via bronchial arteries during CPB and with resumption of the pulmonary circulation during weaning. These agents increase pulmonary capillary permeability, perivascular edema, and bronchial secretions, and perhaps cause observed changes in alveolar surfactant.765 The combination of increased interstitial lung water and bronchial secretions, altered surfactant, patient factors, and the consequences of operation reduces pulmonary compliance and functional residual capacity and increases the work of breathing.766 All of these changes combine to enhance regional atelectasis, increase susceptibility to infection, and increase the physiologic arterial-venous shunt, which reduces systemic arterial PaO2.

Postoperative respiratory care is based upon restoring normal pulmonary capillary permeability and interstitial lung volume; preventing atelectasis; reinflating atelectatic segments; maintaining normal arterial blood gases; and preventing infection and facilitating removal of bronchial mucus. Improved postoperative respiratory care, an understanding of the mechanisms of lung injury during CPB, and efforts to prevent or control the causes of injury767,768 have markedly reduced the incidence of pulmonary complications in recent years769 (see Chapter 16 for a more detailed discussion of postoperative care).

Acute respiratory distress syndrome is a rare complication of lung injury during cardiopulmonary bypass and is usually caused by intrabronchial bleeding from traumatic injury by the endotracheal tube or pulmonary artery catheter,766 or to extravasation of blood into alveoli from acute increases in pulmonary venous pressure or severe pulmonary capillary toxic injury.

RENAL INJURY

As with other organs, the preoperative health of the kidneys is a major factor in the ability of that organ to withstand the microembolic, cellular,770 and regional malperfusion injuries caused by CPB. Risk factors for postoperative renal dysfunction include age over 70 years, diabetes mellitus, previous cardiac surgery, congestive heart failure, and a complex, prolonged operation.771 The incidence of acute renal failure requiring dialysis after CPB is remarkably low, averaging 1%; however, the incidence increases to 5% with complex operations.772

Some degree of renal injury is inevitable during CPB773 and postperfusion proteinuria occurs in all patients.774 Increased expression of neutrophil CD11b receptors and elevated neutrophil count are significantly related to postoperative acute renal failure, defined as a 150% increase in plasma creatinine over baseline.775 Renal blood and plasma flow, creatinine clearance, free water clearance, and urine volume decrease without hemodilution.776 Hemodilution attenuates most of these functional changes and also reduces the risk of hemoglobin precipitation in renal tubules if plasma-binding proteins become saturated with free hemoglobin during extracorporeal perfusion. Hemoglobin is toxic to renal tubules and precipitation can block both blood and urine flow to the tubules.777 Hemodilution dilutes plasma hemoglobin; improves flow to the outer renal cortex; improves total renal blood flow; increases creatinine, electrolyte, and water clearance; and increases glomerular filtration and urine volume.775

Perioperative periods of low cardiac output and/or hypotension added to the microembolic, cellular, and cytotoxic injuries of CPB, and to any preoperative renal disease are the major causes of postoperative renal failure.770,777 Low cardiac output reduces renal perfusion pressure and causes angiotensin II production and renin release, which further decrease renal blood flow. Kidneys, already compromised by preoperative disease and the CPB injury, are particularly sensitive to ischemic injury secondary to low cardiac output and hypotension. Thus perioperative management includes efforts to maximize cardiac output using dopamine or dobutamine if necessary,778 avoiding renal arterial vasoconstrictive drugs, providing adequate crystalloid infusions to maintain urine volume, and alkalinizing urine to minimize precipitation of tubular hemoglobin if excessive hemolysis has occurred. Preliminary studies with a natriuretic peptide found in human urine, urodilantin, indicate the possibility of attenuating postoperative oliguria.779

If perioperative low cardiac output and hypotension do not occur,780 the normal kidney has sufficient functional reserve to provide adequate renal function during and after operation. The appearance of oliguric renal failure is ominous and usually requires dialysis, which is generally permanent if required for more than 2 weeks.780 Oliguric renal failure markedly increases morbidity and mortality by approximately eightfold.781

INJURY TO THE LIVER AND GASTROINTESTINAL ORGANS

Although subjected to microemboli, cytotoxins, and regional malperfusion during CPB, the enormous functional reserve and reparative processes of the normal liver nearly always overcome the injury without consequences. Often liver enzymes are mildly elevated,782 and 10 to 20% of patients are mildly jaundiced.783 Extensive red cell hemolysis increases the likelihood of mild jaundice. Persistent and rising bilirubin two or more days after CPB may precede development of liver failure and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality.784 Catastrophic liver failure, however, occurs in patients with overwhelming sepsis, oliguric renal failure, anesthetic or drug toxicity, or after a prolonged period of low cardiac output or an episode of hemorrhagic shock and multiple blood transfusions and is uniformly fatal.785 The liver usually is involved in patients who develop multiorgan failure and is often presaged by sudden hypoglycemia.

PANCREATIC INJURY

Less than 1% of patients develop clinical pancreatitis after CPB, but approximately 30% develop a transitory, asymptomatic increase in plasma amylase and/or lipase.786788 Autopsy studies of the pancreas soon after CPB indicate occasional evidence of histologic pancreatitis.789 A history of recurrent pancreatitis, perioperative circulatory shock or hypotension, excessively prolonged CPB, and continuous high doses of inotropic agents are risk factors for developing postoperative pancreatitis.790 Experimentally and clinically, high doses of calcium increase intracellular trypsinogen activation and histologic evidence of pancreatitis.791793 Fulminant pancreatitis is very rare, but is often fatal.794

STOMACH AND GUT INJURY

CPB at adequate flow rates does not decrease splanchnic blood flow.795 Risk factors for gastrointestinal complications include advanced age, emergency surgery, prolonged CPB, postoperative low cardiac output or shock, prolonged vasopressor therapy, and elevated preoperative systemic venous pressure.796

CPB decreases gastric pH, which declines further after operation.797 Prior to the advent of histamine blockers and regular use of antacids, duodenal and/or gastric erosion, ulcer, and bleeding were frequent complications following clinical cardiac surgery798 and were associated with mortality that approached 33 to 50%.799 These complications are now uncommon.

Several days to 1 week after operation very elderly patients rarely may develop mesenteric vasculitis or severe mesenteric vasoconstriction that proceeds to small bowel ischemia and/or infarction in response to vasopressors. New-onset abdominal pain with a silent, rigid abdomen and abrupt rise in white blood cell count may be the only signs of this catastrophic complication, which is frequently fatal. If suspected before infarction, infusion of papaverine or alternative vasodilators directly into the mesenteric arteries may prevent or limit subsequent infarction.800 The role of CPB in the etiology of this complication is not known.

Acknowledgements

The author would like to acknowledge the contributions of the authors of this chapter in the preceding edition: L. Henry Edmunds, Jr., Eugene A. Hessel, II, Robert W. Colman, and Philippe Menasche.

References

  1. Levy JH, Hug CC: Use of cardiopulmonary bypass in studies of the circulation. Br J Anaesth 1988; 60:35S.[Medline]
  2. Carson JL, Poses RM, Spence RK, et al: Severity of anaemia and operative mortality and morbidity. Lancet 1988; 1:727.[Medline]
  3. Kolkka R, Hilberman M: Neurologic dysfunction following cardiac operation with low-flow, low-pressure cardiopulmonary bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1980; 79:432.[Abstract]
  4. Downing SW, Edmunds LH Jr: Release of vasoactive substances during cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg 1992; 54:1236.[Abstract]
  5. Robicsek F, Masters TN, Niesluchowski W, et al: Vasomotor activity during cardiopulmonary bypass, in Utley JR (ed): Pathophysiology and Techniques of Cardiopulmonary Bypass, Vol. II. Baltimore, Williams & Wilkins, 1983; p 1.
  6. Murkin JM, Martzke JS, Buchan AM, et al: A randomized study of the influence of perfusion technique and pH management strategy in 316 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery, II: neurologic and cognitive outcomes. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1995; 110:349.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Patel RL, Turtle MR, Chambers DJ, et al: Alpha-stat acid-base regulation during cardiopulmonary bypass improves neuropsychologic outcome in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996; 111:1267.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Stump DA, Brown WR, Moody DM, et al: Microemboli and neurologic dysfunction after cardiovascular surgery. Semin Cardiothorac Vascular Anesth 1999; 3:47.
  9. Stone JG, Young WL, Smith CR, et al: Do standard monitoring sites reflect true brain temperature when profound hypothermia is rapidly induced and reversed? Anesthesiology 1995; 82:344.[Medline]
  10. Smith EEJ, Naftel DC, Blackstone EH, Kirklin JW: Microvascular permeability after cardiopulmonary bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1987; 94:225.[Abstract]
  11. Pacifico AD, Digerness S, Kirklin JW: Acute alterations of body composition after open intracardiac operations. Circulation 1970; 41:331.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Edmunds LH Jr, Williams W: Microemboli and the use of filters during cardiopulmonary bypass, in Utley JR (ed): Pathophysiology and Techniques of Cardiopulmonary Bypass, Vol. II. Baltimore, Williams & Wilkins, 1983; p 101.
  13. Webb WR, Harrison LH, Helmcke FR, et al: Carbon dioxide field flooding minimizes residual intracardiac air after open-heart operations. Ann Thorac Surg 1997; 64:1489.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Brooker RF, Brown WR, Moody DM, et al: Cardiotomy suction: a major source of brain lipid emboli during cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg 1998; 65:1651.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Slogoff S, Girgis KZ, Keats AS: Etiologic factors in neuropsychiatric complications associated with cardiopulmonary bypass. Anesth Analg 1982; 61:903.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Kincaid EH, Jones TJ, Stump DA, et al: Processing scavenged blood with a cell saver reduces cerebral lipid microembolization. Ann Thorac Surg 2000; 70:1296.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Reichenspurner H, Navia JA, Benny G, et al: Particulate embolic capture by an intra-aortic filter device during cardiac surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000; 119:233.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Cook DJ, Zehr KJ, Orszulak TA, Slater JM: Profound reduction in brain embolization using an endoaortic baffle during bypass in swine. Ann Thorac Surg 2002; 73:198.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Barzilai B, Marshall WG Jr, Saffitz JE, et al: Avoidance of embolic complications by ultrasonic characterization of the ascending aorta. Circulation 1989; 80:1275.
  20. Macoviak JA, Hwang J, Boerjan KL, Deal DD: Comparing dualstream and standard cardiopulmonary bypass in pigs. Ann Thorac Surg 2002; 73:203.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Hammon JW, Stump DA, Butterworth JE, et al: Single cross clamp improves six month cognitive outcome in high risk coronary bypass patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006; 131:114.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Loop FD, Higgins TL, Panda R, et al: Myocardial protection during cardiac operations: decreased morbidity and lower cost with blood cardioplegia and coronary sinus perfusion. J Cardiovasc Surg 1992; 104:608.
  23. Sundt TM, Barner HB, Camillo CJ, et al: Total arterial revascularization with an internal thoracic artery and radial artery T graft. Ann Thorac Surg 1999; 68:399.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Tector AJ, Amundsen S, Schmahl TM, et al: Total revascularization with T grafts. Ann Thorac Surg 1994; 57:33.[Abstract]
  25. Jones TJ, Dea DD, Vernon JC, et al: Does vacuum-assisted venous drainage increase gaseous microemboli during cardiopulmonary bypass? Ann Thorac Surg 2002; 74:2132.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Menninger FJ 3rd, Rosenkranz ER, Utley JR, et al: Interstitial hydrostatic pressure in patients undergoing CABG and valve replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1980; 79:181.[Abstract]
  27. Downing SW, Savage EB, Streicher JS, et al: The stretched ventricle: myocardial creep and contractile dysfunction after acute nonischemic ventricular distention. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1992; 104:996.[Abstract]
  28. Shaw PJ: The incidence and nature of neurological morbidity following cardiac surgery: a review. Perfusion 1989; 4:83.[Free Full Text]
  29. Newman S: The incidence and nature of neuropsychological morbidity following cardiac surgery. Perfusion 1989; 4:93.[Free Full Text]
  30. Svensson LG, Nadolny EM, Kimmel WA: Multimodal protocol influence on stroke and neurocognitive deficit prevention after ascending/arch aortic operations. Ann Thorac Surg 2002; 74:2040.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Newman S, Smith P, Treasure T, et al: Acute neuropsychological consequences of coronary artery bypass surgery. Curr Psychol Res Rev 1987; 6:115.
  32. Murkin JM, Stump DA, Blumenthal JA, et al: Defining dysfunction: group means versus incidence analysis—a statement of consensus. Ann Thorac Surg 1997; 64:904.[Medline]
  33. Baird A, Benfield A, Schlaug G, et al: Enlargement of human cerebral ischemic lesion volumes measured by diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Neurol 1997; 41:581.[Medline]
  34. Bendszus M, Reents W, Franke D, et al: Brain damage after coronary artery bypass grafting. Arch Neurol 2002; 59:1090.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Rosen B, Belliveau J, Vevea J, et al: Perfusion imaging with NMR contrast agents. Magn Reson Med 1990; 14:249.[Medline]
  36. Maragos PJ, Schmechel DE: Neuro-specific enolase, a clinically useful marker for neurons and neuroendocrine cells. Annu Rev Neuro Sci 1987; 10:269.
  37. Persson L, Hardemark HG, Gustafsson J, et al: S-100 protein and neuro-specific enolase in cerebrospinal fluid and serum: markers of cell damage in human central nervous system. Stroke 1987; 18:911.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Zimmer DB, Cornwall EH, Landar A, Song W: The S-100 protein family: history, function, and expression. Brain Res Bull 1995; 37: 417.[Medline]
  39. Johnsson P, Blomquist S, Luhrs C, et al: Neuron-specific enolase increases in plasma during and immediately after extracorporeal circulation. Ann Thorac Surg 2000; 69:750.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Anderson RE, Hansson LO, Liska J, et al: The effect of cardiotomy suction on the brain injury marker S100 beta after cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg 2000; 69:847.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Shaw PJ, Bates D, Cartlidge NE, et al: Neurologic and neuropsychological morbidity following major surgery: comparison of coronary artery bypass and peripheral vascular surgery. Stroke 1987; 18:700.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Moller JT, Cluitmans P, Rasmussen LS, et al: Long-term postoperative cognitive dysfunction in the elderly ISPOCD1 study. ISPOCD investigators, International Study of Post-Operative Cognitive Dysfunction. Lancet 1998; 351:857.[Medline]
  43. Jones EL, Weintraub WS, Craver JM, et al: Coronary bypass surgery: is the operation different today? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1991; 101:108.[Abstract]
  44. Tardiff BE, Newman MF, Saunders AM, et al: Preliminary report of a genetic basis for cognitive decline after cardiac operations. Ann Thorac Surg 1997; 64:715.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Roach GW, Kanchugar M, Mangano CM, et al: Adverse cerebral outcomes after coronary bypass surgery: multicenter study of perioperative ischemia research groups and the ischemia research and education foundation investigators. N Engl J Med 1996; 335: 1857.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Weintraub WS, Wenger NK, Jones EL, et al: Changing clinical characteristics of coronary surgery patients: differences between men and women. Circulation 1993; 88:79.
  47. Goto T, Baba T, Yoshitake A, et al: Craniocervical and aortic atherosclerosis as neurologic risk factors in coronary surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2000; 69:834.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Wareing TH, Davila-Roman VG, Daily BB, et al: Strategy for the reduction of stroke incidence in cardiac surgical patients. Ann Thorac Surg 1993; 55:1400.[Abstract]
  49. Stump DA, Brown WR, Moody DM, et al: Microemboli and neurologic dysfunction after cardiovascular surgery. Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 1999; 3:47.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  50. Tuman KJ, McCarthy RJ, Najafi H, et al: Differential effects of advanced age on neurologic and cardiac risks of coronary operations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1992; 104:1510.[Abstract]
  51. Jones TJ, Stump DA, Deal D, et al: Hypothermia protects the brain from embolization by reducing and redirecting the embolic load. Ann Thorac Surg 1999; 68:1465.[Free Full Text]
  52. Gold JP, Charlson ME, Williams-Russo P: Improvement of outcomes after coronary artery bypass; a randomized trial comparing high versus low mean arterial pressure. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1995; 110:1302.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  53. Murkin JM, Farrar JK, Tweed WA, et al: Cerebral autoregulation and flow/metabolism coupling during cardiopulmonary bypass: the role of PaCO2. Anesth Analg 1987; 66:665.
  54. Hill AG, Groom RC, Tewksbury L, et al: Sources of gaseous microemboli during cardiopulmonary bypass. Proc Am Acad Cardiovasc Perfus 1988; 9:122.
  55. Blauth CI: Macroemboli and microemboli during cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg 1995; 59:1300.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  56. Helps SC, Parsons DW, Reilly PL, et al: The effect of gas emboli on rabbit cerebral blood flow. Stroke 1990; 21:94.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  57. Moody DM, Brown WR, Challa VR, et al: Efforts to characterize the nature and chronicle the occurrence of brain emboli during cardiopulmonary bypass. Perfusion 1995; 9:316.
  58. Cook DJ, Oliver WC, Orsulak TA, et al: Cardiopulmonary bypass temperature, hematocrit, and cerebral oxygen delivery in humans. Ann Thorac Surg 1995; 60:1671.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  59. Martin TC, Craver JM, Gott MP, et al: Prospective, randomized trial of retrograde warm-blood cardioplegia: myocardial benefit and neurological threat. Ann Thorac Surg 1994; 59:298.
  60. Engelman RM, Pleet AB, Rouson JA, et al: What is the best perfusion temperature for coronary revascularization? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996; 112:1622.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  61. Avraamides EJ, Murkin JM: The effect of surgical dislocation of the heart on cerebral blood flow in the presence of a single, two-stage venous cannula during cardiopulmonary bypass. Can J Anaesth 1996; 43:A36.
  62. Nathan HJ, Wells GA, Munson JL, Wozny D: Neuroprotective effect of mild hypothermia in patients undergoing coronary artery surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. Circulation 2001; 104(Suppl I):I-85.[Medline]
  63. Brown R, Wright G, Royston D: A comparison of two systems for assessing cerebral venous oxyhaemoglobin saturation during cardiopulmonary bypass in humans. Anaesthesia 1993; 48:697.[Medline]
  64. Michenfelder JD: The interdependency of cerebral functional and metabolic effects following massive doses of thiopental in the dog. Anesthesiology 1974; 41:231.[Medline]
  65. Nussmeier N, Arlund C, Slogoff S: Neuropsychiatric complications after cardiopulmonary bypass: cerebral protection by a barbiturate. Anesthesiology 1986; 64:165.[Medline]
  66. Frumento RJ, O’Malley CM, Bennett-Guerrero E: Stroke after cardiac surgery: A retrospective analysis of the effect of aprotinin dosing regimens. Ann Thorac Surg 2003; 75:479.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  67. Arrowsmith JE, Harrison MJG, Newman SP, et al: Neuroprotection of the brain during cardiopulmonary bypass: a randomized trial of remacemide during coronary artery bypass in 171 patients. Stroke 1998;29:2357.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  68. Mitchell SJ, Pellet O, Gorman DF, et al: Cerebral protection by lidocaine during cardiac operations. Ann Thorac Surg 1999; 67:1117.[Medline]
  69. Diegeler A, Hirsch R. Schneider F, et al: Neuromonitoring and neurocognitive outcome in off-pump versus conventional coronary bypass operation. Ann Thorac Surg 2000; 69:1162.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  70. Puskas JD, Williams WH, Mahoney EM, et al: Off-pump versus conventional coronary bypass grafting: Early and one year graft patency, cost and quality of life outcomes. JAMA 2000; 291:1841.
  71. Newman MF, Kirchner JL, Phillips-Bute B, et al: Longitudinal assessment of neurocognitive function after coronary artery bypass grafting. N Engl J Med 2001; 344:395.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  72. Sotaniemi KA: Cerebral outcome after extracorporeal circulation: comparison between prospective and retrospective evaluations. Arch Neurol 1983; 40:75.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  73. Maggart M, Stewart S: The mechanisms and management of noncardiogenic pulmonary edema following cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg 1987; 43:231.[Abstract]
  74. Lloyd J, Newman J, Brigham K: Permeability pulmonary edema: diagnosis and management. Arch Intern Med 1984; 144:143.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  75. Allardyce D, Yoshida S, Ashmore P: The importance of microembolism in the pathogenesis of organ dysfunction caused by prolonged use of the pump oxygenator. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1966; 52:706.[Medline]
  76. Tonz M, Mihaljevic T, von Segesser LK, et al: Acute lung injury during cardiopulmonary bypass: are the neutrophils responsible? Chest 1995; 108:1551.[Medline]
  77. Chenoweth DE, Cooper SW, Hugli TE, et al: Complement activation during cardiopulmonary bypass: evidence for generation of C3a and C5a anaphylatoxins. N Engl J Med 1981; 304:497.[Abstract]
  78. Royston D, Fleming JS, Desai JB, et al: Increased production of peroxidation products associated with cardiac operations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1986; 91:759.[Abstract]
  79. Craddock PR, Fehr J, Brigham KL, et al: Complement and leukocyte-mediated pulmonary dysfunction in hemodialysis. N Engl J Med 1977; 296:769.[Abstract]
  80. Hammerschmidt DE, Stroncek DF, Bowers TK, et al: Complement activation and neutropenia during cardiopulmonary bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1981; 81:370.[Abstract]
  81. McGowan FX, del Nido PJ, Kurland G, et al: Cardiopulmonary bypass significantly impairs surfactant activity in children. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1993; 106:968.[Abstract]
  82. Oster JB, Sladen RN, Berkowitz DE: Cardiopulmonary bypass and the lung, in Gravlee GP, Davis RF, Kurusz M, Utley JR (eds): Cardiopulmonary Bypass: Principles and Practice. Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2000; p 367.
  83. Magnusson L, Zemgulis V, Tenling A, et al: Use of a vital capacity maneuver to prevent atelectasis after cardiopulmonary bypass: an experimental study. Anesthesiology 1998; 88:134.[Medline]
  84. Cogliati AA, Menichetti A, Tritapepe L, et al: Effects of three techniques of lung management on pulmonary function during cardiopulmonary bypass. Acta Anaesth Belg 1996; 47:73.[Medline]
  85. Sirivella A, Gielchinsky I, Parsonnet V: Management of catheter-induced pulmonary artery perforation: a rare complication in cardiovascular operations. Ann Thorac Surg 2001; 72: 2056.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  86. Rinder CS, Fontes M, Mathew JP, et al: Neutrophil CD11b upregulation during cardiopulmonary bypass is associated with postoperative renal injury. Ann Thorac Surg 2003; 75:899.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  87. Chertow G, Mazarus J, Christiansen C, et al: Preoperative renal risk stratification. Circulation 1997; 95:878.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  88. Zanardo G, et al: Acute renal failure in the patient undergoing cardiac operation: prevalence, mortality rate, and main risk factors. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1994; 107:1489.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  89. Settergren G, Ohqvist G: Renal dysfunction during cardiac surgery. Curr Opin Anesthesiol 1994; 7:59.[Medline]
  90. Feindt PR, Walcher S, Volkmer I, et al: Effects of high-dose aprotinin on renal function in aortocoronary bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 1995; 60:1076.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  91. Utley JR: Renal function and fluid balance with cardiopulmonary bypass, in Gravlee GP, Davis RF, Utley JR (eds): Cardiopulmonary Bypass: Principles and Practice. Baltimore, Williams & Wilkins, 1993; p 488.
  92. Clyne DH, Kant KS, Pesce AJ, et al: Nephrotoxicity of low molecular weight serum proteins: physicochemical interactions between myoglobin, hemoglobin, Bence Jones proteins and Tamm-Horsfall mucoprotein. Curr Prob Clin Biochem 1979; 9:299.
  93. Abel RM, Buckley MJ, Austen WG, et al: Etiology, incidence and prognosis of renal failure following cardiac operations: results of a prospective analysis of 500 consecutive patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1976; 71:32.
  94. Conger J: Interventions in clinical acute renal failure: what are the data? Am J Kidney Dis 1995; 26:565.[Medline]
  95. Wiebe K, Meyer M, Wahlers T, et al: Acute renal failure following cardiac surgery is reverted by administration of urodilatin (INN: ularitide). Eur J Med Res 1996; 1:259.[Medline]
  96. Blachey JD, Henrich WL: The diagnosis and management of acute renal failure. Semin Nephrol 1981; 1:11.[Medline]
  97. Mangano C, et al: Renal dysfunction after myocardial revascularization: risk factors, adverse outcomes and hospital resource utilization. The Multicenter Study of Perioperative Ischemia Research Group. Anesth Analg 1998; 1:3.
  98. Welbourn N, Melrose DG, Moss DW: Changes in serum enzyme levels accompanying cardiac surgery with extracorporeal circulation. J Clin Pathol 1966; 19:220.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  99. Collins JD, Ferner R, Murray A, et al: Incidence and prognostic importance of jaundice after cardiopulmonary bypass surgery. Lancet 1983; 1:1119.[Medline]
  100. Krasna MJ, Flancbaum L, Trooskin SZ, et al: Gastrointestinal complications after cardiac surgery. Surgery 1988; 104:773.[Medline]
  101. Rattner DW, Gu Z-Y, Vlahakes GJ, et al: Hyperamylasemia after cardiac surgery. Ann Surg 1989; 209:279.[Medline]
  102. Fernandez-del Castillo C, Harringer W, Warshaw AL, et al: Risk factors for pancreatic cellular injury after cardiopulmonary bypass. N Engl J Med 1991; 325:382.[Abstract]
  103. Haas GS, Warshaw AL, Daggett WM, et al: Acute pancreatitis after cardiopulmonary bypass. Am J Surg 1985; 149:508.[Medline]
  104. Feiner H: Pancreatitis after cardiac surgery: a morphologic study. Am J Surg 1976; 131:684.[Medline]
  105. Lefor AT, Vuocolo P, Parker FB Jr, et al: Pancreatic complications following cardiopulmonary bypass: factors influencing mortality. Arch Surg 1992; 127:1225.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  106. Izsak EM, Shike M, Roulet M, et al: Pancreatitis in association with hypercalcemia in patients receiving total parenteral nutrition. Gastroenterology 1980; 79:555.[Medline]
  107. Mithofer K, Fernandes-del Castillo C, Frick TW, et al: Acute hypercalcemia causes acute pancreatitis and ectopic trypsinogen activation in the rat. Gastroenterology 1995; 109:239.[Medline]
  108. Waele BD, Smitz J, Willems G: Recurrent pancreatitis secondary to hypercalcemia following vitamin D poisoning. Pancreas 1989; 4:378.[Medline]
  109. Rose DM, Ranson JHC, Cunningham JN, et al: Patterns of severe pancreatic injury following cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Surg 1984; 199:168.[Medline]
  110. Mori A, Watanabe K, Onoe M, et al: Regional blood flow in the liver, pancreas and kidney during pulsatile and nonpulsatile perfusion under profound hypothermia. Jpn Circ J 1988; 52: 219.[Medline]
  111. Decker GAG, Josselsohn E, Svensson L, et al: Acute gastroduodenal complications after cardiopulmonary bypass surgery. S Afr J Surg 1984; 22:261.[Medline]
  112. Fiddian-Green RG, Baker S: Predictive valve of the stomach wall pH for complications after cardiac operations: comparison with other monitoring. Crit Care Med 1987; 15:153.[Medline]
  113. Shangraw RE: Splanchnic, hepatic and visceral effects, in Gravlee GP, Davis RF, Utley JR (eds): Cardiopulmonary Bypass: Principles and Practice. Baltimore, Williams & Wilkins, 1993; p 391.
  114. Heikkinen LO, Ala-Kulju KV: Abdominal complications following cardiopulmonary bypass in open-heart surgery. Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1987; 21:1.[Medline]
  115. Hanks JB, Curtis SE, Hanks BB, et al: Gastrointestinal complications after cardiopulmonary bypass. Surgery 1982; 92:394.[Medline]
  116. Moneta GL, Misbach GA, Ivey TD: Hypoperfusion as a possible factor in the development of gastrointestinal complications after cardiac surgery. Am J Surg 1985; 149:648.[Medline]




This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this book
Right arrow Author home page(s):
John W. Hammon
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hammon, J. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hammon, J. W.